When researching whether autism is overdiagnosed, Google’s related search suggested, “Why is everyone autistic now?”
Is autism on the rise and affecting individuals in record numbers? Is there a problem with diagnostic criteria that results in an ever-widening spectrum, where normal behavior is pathologized?
Is autism being overdiagnosed?
Could I be on the spectrum? Perhaps you’ve wondered this while observing conversations about autism among famous people.
Online quizzes and pop psychology often encourage us to read too much into everyday social awkwardness or strong interests.
Sometimes, mild or borderline autistic traits are enough for people to consider themselves on the spectrum, even if those traits fall near the edges of diagnostic criteria.
In today’s culture, people sometimes borrow symptoms from different medical conditions, mixing terms like ADHD with creativity or identifying with the concept of “gifted Aspies.”
While this can help reduce stigma, it may also blur the seriousness of autism as a true neurodevelopmental disorder.
Media portrayals and cultural trends have contributed to this, influencing public perception and possibly inflating autism rates.
Parents may also accept an autism diagnosis for their child when another condition, such as sensory processing disorder, might be a better fit.
Since an autism diagnosis can open doors for treatment and support, it is sometimes seen as a practical choice.
These factors and more contribute to concerns about the overdiagnosis of autism, raising the question: Is autism truly being overdiagnosed?
Is the rising prevalence of autism due to overdiagnosis?
Autism was first systematically described in 1943 as “infantile autism,” though the term “autism” itself was originally used much earlier to describe traits seen in adult schizophrenia.
In the 1960s, autism was often misunderstood and wrongly attributed to cold or unloving parenting, a theory that has since been discredited.
Back then, autism was diagnosed in about 1 in 4,000 children, but today, estimates show around 1 in 31 children are identified on the autism spectrum.
This significant increase could suggest overdiagnosis of autism, but other factors also play a role, such as greater awareness, more accessible diagnostic services, and changes in how autism is understood socially and medically.
During earlier decades, the stigma around autism and the blame placed on parents made seeking a diagnosis difficult and shameful.
Today, growing acceptance of neurodiversity and better autism education encourage families to pursue diagnosis and support without shame.
The diagnostic criteria have also evolved over time, becoming broader and more inclusive, which may contribute to higher diagnosis rates.
While some question if this leads to overdiagnosing autism, it also reflects a shift toward recognizing a wider range of autistic experiences and behaviors.
Why is autism diagnosed more often today?
Many experts agree that the increase in autism diagnoses over recent years is partly due to changes in how autism is defined and diagnosed.
As diagnostic criteria have broadened and reporting practices improved, more children who might have been overlooked before are now identified as autistic.
This means that the rising numbers don’t necessarily point to an “autism epidemic,” but rather to better recognition and understanding of the condition.
At the same time, the wide range of behaviors included under the autism spectrum makes diagnosis complicated.
Autism was once misunderstood as a form of childhood schizophrenia or blamed on parenting styles, but today it is recognized as a complex neurodevelopmental condition with many different presentations.
The broad and sometimes vague nature of the spectrum can lead to some cases being labeled autistic even when symptoms are mild or unclear. This broadness has caused debate.
On the one hand, narrowing diagnostic criteria might exclude children who require support. On the other hand, a very broad diagnosis risks overdiagnosis, where individuals with only minor challenges might be included.
Parents may feel confused or frustrated by media reports about autism prevalence and the idea of an “autism epidemic,” especially as early diagnosis and intervention become more emphasized.
The latest diagnostic manual groups all autism-related conditions under one umbrella term, autism spectrum disorder, which has added to the complexity.
Doctors sometimes find it difficult to draw clear lines between autism and other conditions, especially when a child’s symptoms are borderline or don’t fit a typical pattern.
In short, the evolving definition and diagnosis of autism have played a big role in the rise in autism rates, but questions remain about other factors that might also be involved.
Autism statistics
So, what do statistics say? Is autism actually overdiagnosed? Recent studies suggest that there may be an overdiagnosis of the condition.
Not only is autism being overdiagnosed, but research also suggests that the difference between those with autism and those without the condition is shrinking.
Does it matter? If an extra 10% of kids are being diagnosed with autism, are the implications serious enough to warrant a revision of diagnostic criteria?
Mothers struggling to get resources for their children who require significant support answer with a resounding yes.
Autism, the gateway
Others feel it perfectly okay to use autism as a gateway to getting children the services and resources they need. The former head of the US National Institute of Mental Health, Judy Rapaport famously said: “I’ll call a kid a zebra if it will get him the educational services I think he needs.”
The intention behind constructing an umbrella term to cover autism spectrum disorder was probably not to create enough shade to cover every difficult-to-diagnose childhood disorder. But if your child will only get the necessary interventions with a recognized diagnosis like autism, parents are likely to steer the diagnosis in this direction.
Resource allocation is not the only contentious issue linked to overdiagnosis; inflated prevalence rates also lead to false perceptions with far reaching implications. When parents hear autism is affecting more and more children every year, they want a culprit. Some tangible risk to remove from their lives. This atmosphere creates the perfect breeding ground for fear mongering about vaccinations, toxic diets and parenting mistakes.
Redefining autism
If we could zone in on a more precise autism definition, or if our understanding of the condition was complete, would overdiagnosis still occur? Some individuals on the spectrum feel misdiagnosis and overdiagnosis are part of a bigger problem—we still don’t know what autism really is. Austistic individuals should contribute to redefining autism. A definition constructed from the inside will have a significant impact on better diagnoses.
Another area that needs to be addressed with urgency is a separate medical diagnosis for sensory processing disorder (SPD). The fact that many medical professionals refuse to believe in the legitimacy of this condition means parents feel pressured into accepting an autism diagnosis for their children—to receive treatment, services and interventions. It will be difficult to determine, but interesting to note the overdiagnosis of autism because of conditions like SPD.
Not overly concerned
Reading about autism overdiagnosis, it becomes obvious that many medical experts are not too worried about it. They seem to accept that a child who needs help will sometimes receive the correct intervention, under a not quite right diagnosis. Maybe autism is being overdiagnosed, but hopefully the estimated 10% who fall into this overdiagnosis category are getting the right intervention under the wrong label.
FAQs
Q: Does autism get overdiagnosed?
A: Some experts believe autism can be overdiagnosed due to broader diagnostic criteria and increased awareness. However, others argue that many cases still go undiagnosed, especially in adults and females.
Q: Why are so many people getting diagnosed with autism?
A: More people are diagnosed today because autism definitions have expanded and awareness has increased among parents and professionals. Improved screening tools and better understanding also lead to more accurate identification.
Q: What is 90% of autism caused by?
A: About 90% of autism cases are believed to be caused by a combination of genetic factors. Environmental influences may also play a role, but genetics remains the primary contributor.
Q: Is it true that we all have autism?
A: No, not everyone has autism; it is a neurodevelopmental condition with specific traits that differ from typical development. While some traits may exist on a spectrum, autism as a diagnosis applies only to those who meet certain criteria.
References
Fombonne, E. (2023). Is autism overdiagnosed?. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64(5), 711-714. https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcpp.13806
Rowland, D. (2020). A need to redefine autism. Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology, 11(1), 001-004. https://davidrowland.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/a-need-to-redefine-autism.pdf
Rowland, D. (2023). Epidemic of False Diagnoses of Autism. Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research, 1. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Rowland-9/publication/368351237_Epidemic_of_False_Diagnoses_of_Autism/links/63e3af64e2e1515b6b7e8406/Epidemic-of-False-Diagnoses-of-Autism.pdf
Davidovitch, M., Shmueli, D., Rotem, R. S., & Bloch, A. M. (2021). Diagnosis despite clinical ambiguity: physicians’ perspectives on the rise in Autism Spectrum disorder incidence. BMC psychiatry, 21, 1-6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-021-03151-z
Russell, G. (2021). The rise of autism: Risk and resistance in the age of diagnosis (p. 202). Taylor & Francis. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/43211
Harris, E. (2023). Autism prevalence has been on the rise in the US for decades—and that’s progress. JAMA, 329(20), 1724-1726. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2804698
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Folstein, S., & Rutter, M. (1977). Infantile autism: a genetic study of 21 twin pairs. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 18(4), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1977.tb00443.x
Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.
Lotter, V. (1967) Epidemiology of autistic conditions in young children. Soc Psychiatry 1, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00578950.
Neggers Y. H. (2014). Increasing prevalence, changes in diagnostic criteria, and nutritional risk factors for autism spectrum disorders. ISRN nutrition, 2014, 514026. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/514026.
Rødgaard, E. M., Jensen, K., Vergnes, J. N., Soulières, I., & Mottron, L. (2019). Temporal Changes in Effect Sizes of Studies Comparing Individuals With and Without Autism: A Meta-analysis. JAMA psychiatry, 76(11), 1124–1132. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1956.
Other articles you may be interested in:
- Regressive Autism – Why It Occurs
- Study Results: Scientists Identify Autism within a Year of Birth
- Is Autism Diagnosis Meaningless?
- What is the ICD Code for Autism?
- 8 Things to Do After an Autism Diagnosis
- How Late Can Autism Develop? All You Need to Know
- Can You Develop Autism? All You Need to Know














